watervole: (books)
Judith Proctor ([personal profile] watervole) wrote2010-11-15 10:40 am

Two books without a plot

Cranford - Elizabeth Gaskell

A gentle book in which nothing much happens, but which happens in such minute detail that you end up fascinated by the social mores of who will condescend to speak to whom in a tiny English village.

These are the upper class women who didn't find a rich husband, and are trapped by poverty and social convention into a genteel poverty that seeks desperately to convince itself that any sign of wealth would be ostentatious in any case.

Yet, even in this stilted social setting, the people are still capable of quiet acts of kindness (and have the understanding to conceal their help so as not to burden their friend with the need for gratitude).

This is a book that I'm sure I'll read again.


Sheepfarmer's Daughter - Elizabeth Moon

I really enjoyed Moon's Serrano Legacy SF novels, so I was looking forward to her fantasy series, The Deed of Paksenarrion.  However, although the background of the mercenary troop conveys a knowledge of the military (Moon was in the US Marine Corps), there's no darn plot!  I got nearly half way through the book before giving up in disgust.  There was what appeared to be a plot thread at the start, but it petered out into nothing and the 'story' just becomes endless bits of marches and combat practice.

The background is detailed, but I need more than just  background to hold my interest.  I can survive without plot (Cranford has almost no plot), but for that to happen, I need characters I can relate to - and Paksenarrion fails the test.  Looking at Wikipedia, I see that this was Moon's first novel.  Perhaps that explains why I like her later work better.

[identity profile] vjezkova.livejournal.com 2010-11-15 06:52 pm (UTC)(link)
E. Gaskell was one of many authors we had to read during my too fast and too short studies of English at university. I confess that I avoided reading Cranford exactly for a lack of plot you mention. Instead of that, I read "Mary Barton". I must say that I liked it very much, even that "utopic socialism" together with realistic descriptions.
I also like J.Austen very much for her clever irony and witty comments, also great characters.
ext_15862: (Default)

[identity profile] watervole.livejournal.com 2010-11-16 10:11 am (UTC)(link)
I love Jane Austen, she has such a wonderful eye for characters. I suspect you'd enjoy Cranford for the same reason - and the sad irony that these are the women of Jane Austen's world who failed to find a husband.

I haven't yet read Mary Barton - I shall have to look out for it.

[identity profile] vjezkova.livejournal.com 2010-11-16 06:13 pm (UTC)(link)
And I will try and read Cranford.
Have you tried that YouTube videos on Czech and Moravian dancing?
ext_202070: (Default)

The Deeds of Paksenarrion

[identity profile] thebobby.livejournal.com 2010-11-16 08:37 am (UTC)(link)
The main problem with the Deeds of Paksenarrion trilogy is that it takes three books to cover one book worth of plot, due to the world building. I like what Paksenarrion becomes, but I only reread the last book. The middle book of the trilogy was particularly offputting to me.